<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Websites Through The Years: Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/07/22/websites-through-the-years-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/07/22/websites-through-the-years-yahoo/</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/07/22/websites-through-the-years-yahoo/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/07/22/websites-through-the-years-yahoo/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I nearly fell off my chair laughing when I read that first comment. :)
I checked the source. It seems that it took it literally, and then stripped it out as a security measure. If you view the page source you can see a tab character (or something) in your comment where the tag would have been.

Yep, the bigwigs sure can be slow to adopt standards. I suppose a lot of it could have had to do with being so large of a site. They wanted to maintain *maximum* compatibility probably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I nearly fell off my chair laughing when I read that first comment. <img src='http://www.webmaster-source.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I checked the source. It seems that it took it literally, and then stripped it out as a security measure. If you view the page source you can see a tab character (or something) in your comment where the tag would have been.</p>
<p>Yep, the bigwigs sure can be slow to adopt standards. I suppose a lot of it could have had to do with being so large of a site. They wanted to maintain *maximum* compatibility probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V. Neely</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/07/22/websites-through-the-years-yahoo/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>V. Neely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/07/22/websites-through-the-years-yahoo/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>The last comment won't make sense-- I didn't realize the comments box would interpret the &#60;font&#62; tag literally!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last comment won&#8217;t make sense&#8211; I didn&#8217;t realize the comments box would interpret the &lt;font&gt; tag literally!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V. Neely</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/07/22/websites-through-the-years-yahoo/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>V. Neely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/07/22/websites-through-the-years-yahoo/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>"They're still using  tags? How dare they? It's the end of 2004!"

LOL :) I guess even the bigwigs of the web can be a little slow when it comes to adopting new web standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They&#8217;re still using  tags? How dare they? It&#8217;s the end of 2004!&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL <img src='http://www.webmaster-source.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I guess even the bigwigs of the web can be a little slow when it comes to adopting new web standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
