<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snap Shots: Should You Use Them or Not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/08/20/snap-shots-should-you-use-them-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/08/20/snap-shots-should-you-use-them-or-not/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=snap-shots-should-you-use-them-or-not</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/08/20/snap-shots-should-you-use-them-or-not/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/08/20/snap-shots-should-you-use-them-or-not/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>1. I haven&#039;t really used Snap Shots too much since all the new Shots were added, so I didn&#039;t know that.

2. :D I suppose it would. It&#039;s good to know that it leaves the Amazon code alone.

3. Sorry, I wasn&#039;t aware that I was bashing RSS shots. I should clarify. I don&#039;t think they have much use internally, but for external links they&#039;ve got plenty of use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I haven&#8217;t really used Snap Shots too much since all the new Shots were added, so I didn&#8217;t know that.</p>
<p>2. <img src='http://media.webmaster-source.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  I suppose it would. It&#8217;s good to know that it leaves the Amazon code alone.</p>
<p>3. Sorry, I wasn&#8217;t aware that I was bashing RSS shots. I should clarify. I don&#8217;t think they have much use internally, but for external links they&#8217;ve got plenty of use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Angles</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/08/20/snap-shots-should-you-use-them-or-not/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Angles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/08/20/snap-shots-should-you-use-them-or-not/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Hey,

Thanks for a very balanced rundown of Snap Shots.  Obviously, everyone has their opinions and as long as you&#039;ve thought yours through, as you clearly have, then we&#039;ll certainly respect yours.

Three things I&#039;d like to clarify:

1. It&#039;s not entirely &quot;all or nothing&quot; with Snap Shots.  There is a level of customization possible, it&#039;s just techy.  Snap.com has more details.

2. ProductShot very carefully avoids messing with your Amazon code.  That would be a good way to REALLY make people hate us.

3. I think you&#039;re unjustifiably harsh with RSS Shots.  It&#039;s relatively similar to WikiShots in giving you a summary of an article (if it&#039;s permalinked) or headlines (if it&#039;s site linked).  The latter is particularly useful with blogrolls where you can mouseover a lot of links quickly to read their headlines.

Paul D. Angles
Marketing Director
Snap.com: See what you&#039;re looking for
Snap Shots: Let content find you
Snap Shots Add-On: Yes, you can take us with you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>Thanks for a very balanced rundown of Snap Shots.  Obviously, everyone has their opinions and as long as you&#8217;ve thought yours through, as you clearly have, then we&#8217;ll certainly respect yours.</p>
<p>Three things I&#8217;d like to clarify:</p>
<p>1. It&#8217;s not entirely &#8220;all or nothing&#8221; with Snap Shots.  There is a level of customization possible, it&#8217;s just techy.  Snap.com has more details.</p>
<p>2. ProductShot very carefully avoids messing with your Amazon code.  That would be a good way to REALLY make people hate us.</p>
<p>3. I think you&#8217;re unjustifiably harsh with RSS Shots.  It&#8217;s relatively similar to WikiShots in giving you a summary of an article (if it&#8217;s permalinked) or headlines (if it&#8217;s site linked).  The latter is particularly useful with blogrolls where you can mouseover a lot of links quickly to read their headlines.</p>
<p>Paul D. Angles<br />
Marketing Director<br />
Snap.com: See what you&#8217;re looking for<br />
Snap Shots: Let content find you<br />
Snap Shots Add-On: Yes, you can take us with you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JYang</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/08/20/snap-shots-should-you-use-them-or-not/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>JYang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/08/20/snap-shots-should-you-use-them-or-not/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>These are very innovative.  I think they are onto something that will transform the way we consume the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are very innovative.  I think they are onto something that will transform the way we consume the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2012-02-09 20:04:19 by W3 Total Cache -->
