<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Permalink Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=permalink-optimization</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging Tips: Changing Permalinks Reset My Tweetmeme Button Back to Zero! &#124; Lori McNee Artist</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-11079</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging Tips: Changing Permalinks Reset My Tweetmeme Button Back to Zero! &#124; Lori McNee Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-11079</guid>
		<description>[...] if you didn&#8217;t get enough of this permalink stuff &#8211; I highly recommend reading &gt; Permalink Optimization by Webmaster Source (it IS actually interesting even for an artist, like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if you didn&#8217;t get enough of this permalink stuff &#8211; I highly recommend reading &gt; Permalink Optimization by Webmaster Source (it IS actually interesting even for an artist, like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-7235</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-7235</guid>
		<description>tx a lot :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tx a lot <img src='http://media.webmaster-source.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redwall_hp</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-7228</link>
		<dc:creator>redwall_hp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-7228</guid>
		<description>Yes, they do make a difference. &quot;mysite/postname&quot; actually performs better than with &quot;site/month/day/postname&quot; because of the higher keyword density in the URL. 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://&lt;a&gt;www.seomoz.org/blog/11-best-practices-for-urls/&quot;&lt;/a&gt;target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.seomoz.org/blog/11-best-practices-for-...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they do make a difference. &quot;mysite/postname&quot; actually performs better than with &quot;site/month/day/postname&quot; because of the higher keyword density in the URL. </p>
<p>&lt;a href=&#8221;http://<a></a><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/11-best-practices-for-urls/" rel="nofollow">http://www.seomoz.org/blog/11-.....-for-urls/</a>&#8220;target=&#8221;_blank&#8221;&gt;<a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/11-best-practices-for-.." rel="nofollow">http://www.seomoz.org/blog/11-.....ces-for-..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-7225</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-7225</guid>
		<description>hi, i&#039;m wondering..Permalinks matter on Google optimization? I mean..right now i have that kind of permalinks: mysite/postname. i think i will have a better optimization if i use mounth day and postname, or it doesn&#039;t matter for google? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, i&#039;m wondering..Permalinks matter on Google optimization? I mean..right now i have that kind of permalinks: mysite/postname. i think i will have a better optimization if i use mounth day and postname, or it doesn&#039;t matter for google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7 Simple SEO Tips For Bloggers &#187; Webmaster-Source</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>7 Simple SEO Tips For Bloggers &#187; Webmaster-Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>[...] Change Your Permalink Structure - If you use WordPress, don&#8217;t use the default permalink style! Pick the best option for your purposes, and stick with it. The default ?p=37 permalinks will always redirect to the ones you specifically set. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Change Your Permalink Structure &#8211; If you use WordPress, don&#8217;t use the default permalink style! Pick the best option for your purposes, and stick with it. The default ?p=37 permalinks will always redirect to the ones you specifically set. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-622</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I never thought of flicking through monthly archives by the URL before.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
It&#039;s real useful. By the way, I checked your blog to see if you can do that.. Despite the fact that you use the /category/post-name structure, it still works. Try it. Archives for Oct. 2007: http://www.problogdesign.com/2007/10/

I agree about the categories making sense if you think of them as folders (directories to Linux/Unix users). However, there was an additional point I wanted to raise in the post, but I forgot.

/category/post-name/ is good for blogs with a lot of long, timeless content, while /year/month/day/post-name/ is a better option for news sites, and large multi-author blogs with several posts per day (Engadget, for example).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;I never thought of flicking through monthly archives by the URL before.&#8221;</i><br />
It&#8217;s real useful. By the way, I checked your blog to see if you can do that.. Despite the fact that you use the /category/post-name structure, it still works. Try it. Archives for Oct. 2007: <a href="http://www.problogdesign.com/2007/10/" rel="nofollow">http://www.problogdesign.com/2007/10/</a></p>
<p>I agree about the categories making sense if you think of them as folders (directories to Linux/Unix users). However, there was an additional point I wanted to raise in the post, but I forgot.</p>
<p>/category/post-name/ is good for blogs with a lot of long, timeless content, while /year/month/day/post-name/ is a better option for news sites, and large multi-author blogs with several posts per day (Engadget, for example).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael from Pro Blog Design</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael from Pro Blog Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/12/30/permalink-optimization/#comment-621</guid>
		<description>Interesting ideas there Matt. I never thought of flicking through monthly archives by the URL before.

When I set up my permalinks, I was thinking of the more traditional type of web site, with folders and such (An article page would be in a category folder. The URL would then reflect that). It just made more sense to me I suppose (And like you said, it&#039;s less bloggy ;) ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting ideas there Matt. I never thought of flicking through monthly archives by the URL before.</p>
<p>When I set up my permalinks, I was thinking of the more traditional type of web site, with folders and such (An article page would be in a category folder. The URL would then reflect that). It just made more sense to me I suppose (And like you said, it&#8217;s less bloggy <img src='http://media.webmaster-source.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2012-02-09 21:40:38 by W3 Total Cache -->
