Comments on: How to Keep AdBlock From Hiding Your Ads

By: Bob

Bob — Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:11:27 +0000

I can’t believe there really are people out there who want absolutely everything for free. Viewing ads is a small price to pay for getting something.

I’m working on re-showing ads blocked on my site or blocking the users from seeing, free loading (leeching) users are worthless to me so they can jog on for all I care.

By: Christina Marie

Christina Marie — Sun, 06 Feb 2011 01:29:30 +0000

If you don’t like the ads, don’t visit the site and utilize its resources. Kind of hypocritical and one sided isn’t it to go to a site you like but complain about how they make money. I put a lot of time and resources into building informational FREE sites for people. Costs are offset by putting up ads. So like I said, if my visitors don’t like it, they can go somewhere else.

By: Cirke

Cirke — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:25:09 +0000

Everyone who is using Adblock is a moron, and you don’t respect the whole Internet because without ads the Internet cannot be free! I wanna see you when websites will require a monthly fee to use the site… because nobody will click on their ads, but this will never happen because nobody want’s that

By: Matt

Matt — Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:29:55 +0000

I’m not using anti-adblocking right now. As fun as it is, some of my tricks would interfere with my network’s ad serving. It just wasn’t worth the effort.

By: Thaya Kareeson

Thaya Kareeson — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:31:40 +0000

@7, It works for me on my sites.

By: 7

Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:41:20 +0000

Im using Adblock plus and anti-adblock script doesnt work hahaha

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:37:34 +0000

It’s very sad a lot of people don’t seem to understand that creating content for a website costs a lot of time. That developing a cool web application or game, costs a lot of time. That putting and keeping your website online and up-to-date costs a lot of money. While most of today’s website are free, I think in the future a lot of website are going to rethink their business model and charge the user visiting their content. Just like in the old days… the good old days.

By: dreamsburnred

dreamsburnred — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:12:54 +0000

Personally I do not use adblock. As well the websites that I view none of them have annoying ads..except for pc world. Sites like cnet.com, engadget.com, filehippo.com, and my blog have ads that are related to the content but don't scream click me!!

As well ads for free content is just fine.

By: randomnut

randomnut — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:00:54 +0000

Using the Internet without AdBlock has become funny. It’s just like in the comedy movies. Screen full of ads.
Once more people become aware of AdBlock, push advertising will come to an end. That is ethical, in my oppinion.
I believe the only advertising that should be done is the ‘pull’ type, where the user REQUESTS ads – for example when they need a product.

By: redwall_hp

redwall_hp — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:58:48 +0000

"You're actually making something to force somebody to download something against their will."

Nobody's forcing you to load the page. That's your choice entirely. So if you buy a magazine, I suppose the ads in there are being loaded against your will as well? A web page is a finished product, like a magazine. If you load it, you get the whole package. Besides, you would be the one blocking ads against my will. The ads pay for the site; if you can't put up with unobtrusive (yes, unobtrusive, have you looked?) advertisements, then don't read it. That's entirely your choice.