<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webmaster-Source &#187; Logos</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/tag/logos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>HTML5 Gets a Logo</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/01/21/html5-gets-a-logo/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/01/21/html5-gets-a-logo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(x)html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W3C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=3859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The W3C has put up a microsite with the new logo for HTML5. It looks pretty good, certainly better than its predecessors, even if it does have a bit of the &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; look that is finally starting to lose its novelty. I like that they kept the gradients to a minimum, which is starting [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The W3C has put up a microsite with <a href="http://www.w3.org/html/logo/">the new logo for HTML5</a>. It looks pretty good, certainly better than its predecessors, even if it does have a bit of the &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; look that is finally starting to lose its novelty. I like that they kept the gradients to a minimum, which is starting to become more common in the aftermath of the glossy &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; style.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3860 imgborder" title="HTML5 Logo" src="//www.webmaster-source.com/wp-content/uploads/w3c-html5-logo.png" alt="" width="580" height="324" /></p>
<p>You can pick up SVG and PNG versions of the icon there, as well as T-Shirts featuring the logo&#8230;and free stickers if you live in the U.S. and have some spare postage stamps laying around.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2011/01/html5-gains-logo-loses-meaning/">Webmonkey</a> brings up an interesting, and troubling, point about the HTML5 Logo site. The FAQ calls the logo a &#8220;general-purpose visual identity for a broad set of open web technologies, including HTML5, CSS, SVG, WOFF, and others.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>It doesn’t really matter if the New York Times thinks CSS 3 or SVG  are HTML5, but we’d like to think that at least the organization in  charge of describing what is, and is not, HTML5 would make some effort  to distinguish between tools. Lumping everything together is as silly as  a carpenter referring to every tool in their toolkit as “a hammer.”</p></blockquote>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t sound very good to me. Is &#8220;HTML5&#8243; becoming the new buzzword to replace &#8220;Web 2.0,&#8221; and sanctioned by its own standards body?</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> And now it sounds like <a href="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2011/01/html-to-lose-the-version-number.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss">the HTML spec is no longer going to have specific version numbers</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/01/21/html5-gets-a-logo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Halloween Logos</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/11/01/halloween-logos/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/11/01/halloween-logos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halloween]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holliday Redesigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/11/01/halloween-logos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though Smashing Magazine beat me to it, I&#8217;m still going to go ahead with my original plan and show a few logo redesigns that I saw yesterday. I especially like YouTube&#8217;s logo change. It&#8217;s down the list a little, but I think it&#8217;s one of the best. I didn&#8217;t have time to put together [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though <a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/11/01/smashing-pumpkings-and-halloween-redesigns/">Smashing Magazine beat me to it</a>, I&#8217;m still going to go ahead with my original plan and show a few logo redesigns that I saw yesterday.</p>
<p>I especially like YouTube&#8217;s logo change. It&#8217;s down the list a little, but I think it&#8217;s one of the best.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have time to put together a logo change, but maybe next year. <img src="https://www.webmaster-source.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p><a href="http://technorati.com"><img src="http://i12.tinypic.com/63wbgk4.gif" alt="" width="194" height="52" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://google.com"><img src="http://i18.tinypic.com/4mbzbly.jpg" alt="" width="304" height="134" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://miniclip.com"><img src="http://i7.tinypic.com/6atv8ua.jpg" alt="" width="230" height="65" /><span id="more-257"></span></a></p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.com"><img src="http://i2.tinypic.com/6ffjdir.jpg" alt="" width="128" height="68" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://smashingmagazine.com"><img src="http://i9.tinypic.com/65zvv9e.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="99" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://yahoo.com"><img src="http://i8.tinypic.com/4brks2o.jpg" alt="" width="257" height="73" /></a></p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t get around to it, but It would have been cool to put something like this on my site instead of my normal RSS button:</p>
<p><img src="http://i16.tinypic.com/4zjckmo.jpg" alt="" width="124" height="107" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/11/01/halloween-logos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logo Design, Yeah It&#8217;s That Important</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/06/22/logo-design-yeah-its-that-important/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/06/22/logo-design-yeah-its-that-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/06/22/logo-design-yeah-its-that-important/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your logo represents your site. You should spend a fair bit of time on your logo, perfecting it. You won&#8217;t make a very good first impression if you just have plain text at the top of your site reading &#8220;MySite.com&#8221;. Look at all the successful websites you know of, do you see a logo-less one? [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your logo represents your site. You should spend a fair bit of time on your logo, perfecting it. You won&#8217;t make a very good first impression if you just have plain text at the top of your site reading &#8220;MySite.com&#8221;. Look at all the successful websites you know of, do you see a logo-less one? Didn&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Google, Amazon, EBay, Digg, Reddit, Wired&#8230; They all have logos. Each one of those companies invested a substantial amount of time (and probably money) designing a logo. Should your site be different? No. Spend a bit of time in Photoshop, designing a logo.</p>
<p>Before we cover a bit more on logo design, here are a few well-designed logos.  Click the logos to see how they fit in with the actual site.<span id="more-101"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://google.com"><img src="http://i11.tinypic.com/4xxb1fp.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="303" height="109" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com"><img src="http://i15.tinypic.com/6aytedt.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="257" height="78" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ntugo.com"><img src="http://i13.tinypic.com/61mn2b9.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="213" height="78" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://northxeast.com"><img src="http://i18.tinypic.com/54b3ewh.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="232" height="58" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://smashingmagazine.com"><img src="http://i19.tinypic.com/627214k.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="206" height="68" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://photomatt.net"><img src="http://i13.tinypic.com/61ma9aa.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="300" height="152" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://webmaster-source.com"><img src="http://i18.tinypic.com/52vxl3c.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="525" height="78" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://phpbb.com"><img src="http://i15.tinypic.com/641szev.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="300" height="55" /></a></p>
<p>Logo design is an art, as is web design (or virtually anything with the word &#8220;design&#8221; in it&#8230;)</p>
<p>So, how do you design a good logo? First of all, it must match the way the site looks. If you&#8217;ve already finished a layout, save for the logo, make a logo that matches the site (color scheme, etc). The easiest way to handle things is to design the logo first, then design the rest of the site around the logo.</p>
<p>The current trend with logos is to make them look &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243;. Basically that means use gradients, borders, drop shadows, gloss effects, etc. There are plenty of tutorials on &#8220;Web 2.0 logos&#8221;. My advice: Look at the tutorials and learn from them, don&#8217;t just copy what they&#8217;re doing. Then, you can make your own logo with all the techniques you learned.</p>
<p>Your goal as a designer is to create a logo that will (excuse overused phrase)  knock visitors socks off. You want a logo that looks so cool, people will stare at it for five minutes before looking at the rest of the site. If you can do that, they&#8217;ll remember the site and come back. Of course, the site&#8217;s content has to be good too for them to come back, but my point is that the logo should make a lasting impression.</p>
<p>So how do you make a logo?</p>
<ol>
<li>Open Photoshop</li>
<li>Create a sizable document, about 8&#215;10 inches, 300dpi. Why that big? You&#8217;ll be sure you can use the logo for <em>anything,</em> without running into the problem of your logo having to be scaled up. You resize it down to something like 230&#215;80, 72dpi when you export it for the web.</li>
<li>Experiment. Start with some text, style it. Then continue on from there. Inspire yourself by looking at other logos.</li>
</ol>
<p>Three steps, easy isn&#8217;t it? <img src="https://www.webmaster-source.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/06/22/logo-design-yeah-its-that-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-06-10 07:46:55 by W3 Total Cache
-->