<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webmaster-Source &#187; Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/tag/websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Host Static Websites With Amazon S3</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/02/21/host-static-websites-with-amazon-s3/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/02/21/host-static-websites-with-amazon-s3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[static]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=3927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazon S3, the inexpensive storage service, now can be used to host entire static websites. Though the service will accept any kind of file, which makes it great for keeping large or frequently-accessed data (podcasts, software downloads, JavaScript widgets, etc.) off your server, until recently it didn&#8217;t support index files. You could point a domain [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://aws.amazon.com/s3/">Amazon S3</a>, the inexpensive storage service, now can be used to host entire static websites. Though the service will accept any kind of file, which makes it great for keeping large or frequently-accessed data (podcasts, software downloads, JavaScript widgets, etc.) off your server, until recently it didn&#8217;t support index files. You could point a domain to an S3 bucket and upload HTML files, but visitors would get an automatically-generated listing of files instead of your index.html content. That has now changed. Amazon now allows you to setup custom root and error documents.</p>
<blockquote><p>To get started, open the Amazon S3 Management Console, and follow these simple steps:</p>
<p>1) Right-click on your Amazon S3 bucket and open the Properties pane<br />
2) Configure your root and error documents in the Website tab<br />
3) Click Save</p></blockquote>
<p>It seems like a good way to throw up a quick traffic-resistant website, though I imagine it could get expensive pretty quickly if it were, say, submitted to Reddit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/02/21/host-static-websites-with-amazon-s3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PageRank and &#8220;Overall Site Metrics&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/10/26/pagerank-and-overall-site-metrics/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/10/26/pagerank-and-overall-site-metrics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/10/26/pagerank-and-overall-site-metrics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People like to measure and compare things. Metrics affect decisions, like whether someone will buy an ad on your site. Websites are measured in numerous ways. They&#8217;re given an &#8220;overall score&#8221; with PageRank; Feedburner counts the number of people who subscribe to their RSS feeds; and advertisers are forever obsessed with monthly pageviews. Google&#8217;s PageRank [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i20.tinypic.com/2m29p1g.jpg" align="right" height="150" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="200" />People like to measure and compare things. Metrics affect decisions, like whether someone will buy an ad on your site.</p>
<p>Websites are measured in numerous ways. They&#8217;re given an &#8220;overall score&#8221; with PageRank; Feedburner counts the number of people who subscribe to their RSS feeds; and advertisers are forever obsessed with monthly pageviews.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s PageRank is used by many to compare websites, though the fairness of the value is questionable. PageRank basically boils down to <em>Links In &#8211; Links Out = PageRank.</em> So if you have a lot of people linking to you, then you have a higher PageRank. Hording links, and by extension PageRank won&#8217;t get you anywhere either, as you have to link to get linked to.<span id="more-249"></span></p>
<p>Lately, Google has been penalizing sites (by lowering their PageRank) for numerous reasons, many of which are unknown.Â  So basically, Google controls what others (especially advertisers) think of your website. The also control where you appear in search results as well. There are websites which have vanished entirely from Google&#8217;s results&#8230;because the angered the Google Gods by selling text links, or running contests that require a link back to your site (with certain text in the link).</p>
<p>In addition to the unfairness of PageRank, there have been rumors that Google may stop allowing people to see what their PageRank is. That could possibly be a good thing, lowering webmasters&#8217; obsession with it, but does Google have an ulterior motive (besides not having to manage the viewable PageRank systems anymore)? Sure. If you can&#8217;t see your PageRank, it&#8217;s a lot harder to tell whether Google is &#8220;tweaking&#8221; it.</p>
<p>Whether Google stops allowing people to view their PageRank or not, we still need to find a new and more accurate way to judge the overall popularity/&#8221;quality&#8221; of blogs. In th future, will we rely mainly on RSS subscribe count? Technorati Authority? Yahoo &#8220;LinkCount?&#8221; I sure hope we don&#8217;t end up using Alexa Rank&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/10/26/pagerank-and-overall-site-metrics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-06-09 01:44:05 by W3 Total Cache
-->