<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PageRank and &#8220;Overall Site Metrics&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/10/26/pagerank-and-overall-site-metrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/10/26/pagerank-and-overall-site-metrics/</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 19:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/10/26/pagerank-and-overall-site-metrics/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/10/26/pagerank-and-overall-site-metrics/#comment-450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, you have plenty of questions. :D

Let&#039;s see...

1. Google makes the means of viewing one&#039;s &quot;toolbar pagerank&quot; available to pretty much anyone. You can view it through part of the Google Toolbar, or you can use a website such as http://www.checkpagerank.com/

2. PageRank applies to individual pages generally, but most people are concerned mainly with the rank for their main page (e.g. www.webmaster-source.com/).

3. There isn&#039;t exactly a standard &quot;good&quot; PageRank. Huge sites like Apple.com (which has one of the highest ranks ever: 9) get tons of links in, but they pretty much don&#039;t link to any other sites, hence the great rank. The top blogs (see technorati.com/pop/) have ranks like 6 or so because they do plenty of linking, but they&#039;re so popular they have a ton of links coming in as well. I&#039;d say for a blog that&#039;s been around for less than a year 1-2 is what you can expect to have. PageRank 2 is a decent ranking, though this blog only has a rank of 1 because I do a &lt;i&gt;lot&lt;/i&gt; of linking. Really, you shouldn&#039;t worry about PageRank that much. Focus on building a reader base, and making that &quot;Subscribers&quot; counter go up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you have plenty of questions. <img src="https://www.webmaster-source.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230;</p>
<p>1. Google makes the means of viewing one&#8217;s &#8220;toolbar pagerank&#8221; available to pretty much anyone. You can view it through part of the Google Toolbar, or you can use a website such as <a href="http://www.checkpagerank.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.checkpagerank.com/</a></p>
<p>2. PageRank applies to individual pages generally, but most people are concerned mainly with the rank for their main page (e.g. <a href="http://www.webmaster-source.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.webmaster-source.com/</a>).</p>
<p>3. There isn&#8217;t exactly a standard &#8220;good&#8221; PageRank. Huge sites like Apple.com (which has one of the highest ranks ever: 9) get tons of links in, but they pretty much don&#8217;t link to any other sites, hence the great rank. The top blogs (see technorati.com/pop/) have ranks like 6 or so because they do plenty of linking, but they&#8217;re so popular they have a ton of links coming in as well. I&#8217;d say for a blog that&#8217;s been around for less than a year 1-2 is what you can expect to have. PageRank 2 is a decent ranking, though this blog only has a rank of 1 because I do a <i>lot</i> of linking. Really, you shouldn&#8217;t worry about PageRank that much. Focus on building a reader base, and making that &#8220;Subscribers&#8221; counter go up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignorance is bliss</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/10/26/pagerank-and-overall-site-metrics/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignorance is bliss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2007/10/26/pagerank-and-overall-site-metrics/#comment-449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, this pagerank issue has really taken the &quot;blogosphere&quot; by storm. I am not even sure how best to check my pagerank. I see some sites offer such services, but can you check pagerank on Google itself? What is a reliable source and what is considered a good pagerank? Does pagerank actually apply to pages or to an entire site?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this pagerank issue has really taken the &#8220;blogosphere&#8221; by storm. I am not even sure how best to check my pagerank. I see some sites offer such services, but can you check pagerank on Google itself? What is a reliable source and what is considered a good pagerank? Does pagerank actually apply to pages or to an entire site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-05-26 00:58:57 by W3 Total Cache
-->