<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter vs. Pownce</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/02/13/twitter-vs-pownce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/02/13/twitter-vs-pownce/</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Versus Pownce, Pownce Versus Twitter &#171; Isms are dangerous things</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/02/13/twitter-vs-pownce/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Twitter Versus Pownce, Pownce Versus Twitter &#171; Isms are dangerous things]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/02/13/twitter-vs-pownce/#comment-1275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] missed by many. Even where I was looking around to see what other people have written about this, they were all saying that pownce is better but lacking users! How is that possible?! Pownce is the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] missed by many. Even where I was looking around to see what other people have written about this, they were all saying that pownce is better but lacking users! How is that possible?! Pownce is the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/02/13/twitter-vs-pownce/#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/02/13/twitter-vs-pownce/#comment-880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I know what you mean about people not switching easily. Also, people wouldn&#039;t want to lose all of the stuff they Twittered over the months.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I know what you mean about people not switching easily. Also, people wouldn&#8217;t want to lose all of the stuff they Twittered over the months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumesh</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/02/13/twitter-vs-pownce/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/02/13/twitter-vs-pownce/#comment-875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pownce maybe slightly ahead, but the problem is that people refuse to switch easily. It is the same reason in search engines, social networking sites etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pownce maybe slightly ahead, but the problem is that people refuse to switch easily. It is the same reason in search engines, social networking sites etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-04-21 08:34:49 by W3 Total Cache
-->