<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Canonical URLs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/02/16/google-canonical-urls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/02/16/google-canonical-urls/</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 11:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/02/16/google-canonical-urls/#comment-10596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=1825#comment-10596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be warned!! It&#039;s bullshit that Google supports this. Our rankings have plummeted over the past month after enabling canonical URLs instead of permanent 301 redirects and robots.txt ignore. Turns out when we check in Google Webmaster Tools that all our pages that are bound together with the canonical URL are now considered duplicate content. We have over 4,000 duplicates to a site that&#039;s had no duplicates in the past and a good ranking for several years. Thanks Google!

After researching the problem (although I have failed to find an official statement from Google stating their mistakes) it seems everyone are having the same problem. I&#039;ve even heard of people having to 301 redirect / and /index.html as they are being reported as duplicate. Pretty lame.

CONCLUSION after 5 hours research: Google does NOT support canonical URLs!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be warned!! It&#8217;s bullshit that Google supports this. Our rankings have plummeted over the past month after enabling canonical URLs instead of permanent 301 redirects and robots.txt ignore. Turns out when we check in Google Webmaster Tools that all our pages that are bound together with the canonical URL are now considered duplicate content. We have over 4,000 duplicates to a site that&#8217;s had no duplicates in the past and a good ranking for several years. Thanks Google!</p>
<p>After researching the problem (although I have failed to find an official statement from Google stating their mistakes) it seems everyone are having the same problem. I&#8217;ve even heard of people having to 301 redirect / and /index.html as they are being reported as duplicate. Pretty lame.</p>
<p>CONCLUSION after 5 hours research: Google does NOT support canonical URLs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/02/16/google-canonical-urls/#comment-7398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=1825#comment-7398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This looks like a great feature new to Google. I&#039;m sure many web masters, including myself would want to use this. Thanks for the information. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a great feature new to Google. I&#039;m sure many web masters, including myself would want to use this. Thanks for the information. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-05-15 22:59:44 by W3 Total Cache
-->