<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viacom Uploads Their Content to YouTube While Suing Them for it Being There</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/23/viacom-uploads-their-content-to-youtube-while-suing-them-for-it-being-there/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/23/viacom-uploads-their-content-to-youtube-while-suing-them-for-it-being-there/</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/23/viacom-uploads-their-content-to-youtube-while-suing-them-for-it-being-there/#comment-11163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=3152#comment-11163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was under the impression that Viacom would lose simply because YouTube is the classic example of the &quot;Safe Harbor&quot; clause in the DMCA. Third parties upload tons of content, which is not reviewed before it goes online, and YouTube can&#039;t possibly police or be responsible for that.

I, too, was a little surprised that YouTube was allowed to publish that post. It should be interesting to see what happens next, though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that Viacom would lose simply because YouTube is the classic example of the &#8220;Safe Harbor&#8221; clause in the DMCA. Third parties upload tons of content, which is not reviewed before it goes online, and YouTube can&#8217;t possibly police or be responsible for that.</p>
<p>I, too, was a little surprised that YouTube was allowed to publish that post. It should be interesting to see what happens next, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Muldoon</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/23/viacom-uploads-their-content-to-youtube-while-suing-them-for-it-being-there/#comment-11157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Muldoon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=3152#comment-11157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last article I read about this whole thing suggested that Viacom would win the lawsuit with damages close to the 1 billion they are asking for. So if this is true this will really complicate things in the courts.

It does seem strange that YouTube are talking about this whilst the court case is still going on. You&#039;d think that they wouldn&#039;t be allowed to speak about it until it has been completed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last article I read about this whole thing suggested that Viacom would win the lawsuit with damages close to the 1 billion they are asking for. So if this is true this will really complicate things in the courts.</p>
<p>It does seem strange that YouTube are talking about this whilst the court case is still going on. You&#8217;d think that they wouldn&#8217;t be allowed to speak about it until it has been completed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-04-17 01:44:03 by W3 Total Cache
-->