<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Kills Creative Suite, Demands Monthly Subscription</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/2013/05/08/adobe-kills-creative-suite-demands-monthly-subscription/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2013/05/08/adobe-kills-creative-suite-demands-monthly-subscription/</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 11:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2013/05/08/adobe-kills-creative-suite-demands-monthly-subscription/#comment-36766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 22:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=5087#comment-36766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I highly recommend using a text editor like Sublime Text, TextWrangler, Notepad++, Coda, vim or something similar. Dreamweaver is major overkill if you&#039;re not using the visual editor, which is a bad idea in itself. Even in the &#039;90s, it was frowned upon.

Speaking as someone who has made plenty of themes for blogs (including this one) from scratch, there is plenty of market for quality tools for wrangling HTML/CSS or scripting languages. Dreamweaver just really isn&#039;t a tool I would recommend for doing that. A good syntax-highlighting text editor and a browser is all you need.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I highly recommend using a text editor like Sublime Text, TextWrangler, Notepad++, Coda, vim or something similar. Dreamweaver is major overkill if you&#8217;re not using the visual editor, which is a bad idea in itself. Even in the &#8217;90s, it was frowned upon.</p>
<p>Speaking as someone who has made plenty of themes for blogs (including this one) from scratch, there is plenty of market for quality tools for wrangling HTML/CSS or scripting languages. Dreamweaver just really isn&#8217;t a tool I would recommend for doing that. A good syntax-highlighting text editor and a browser is all you need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2013/05/08/adobe-kills-creative-suite-demands-monthly-subscription/#comment-36719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 17:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=5087#comment-36719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DreamWeaver and the other site building software got a bit left behind when people decided to stop building sites and run a weblog instead. Weblog software means you don&#039;t really need an HTML editor any more. 

What do you have against Dreamweaver? It&#039;s funny because I used to hear so many people bashing MS FrontPage when I used that for HTML coding. At that time Dreamweaver was the hero, MSFP the bad guy. 

I do so little HTML now that it is simple enough to just type it into a text editor myself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DreamWeaver and the other site building software got a bit left behind when people decided to stop building sites and run a weblog instead. Weblog software means you don&#8217;t really need an HTML editor any more. </p>
<p>What do you have against Dreamweaver? It&#8217;s funny because I used to hear so many people bashing MS FrontPage when I used that for HTML coding. At that time Dreamweaver was the hero, MSFP the bad guy. </p>
<p>I do so little HTML now that it is simple enough to just type it into a text editor myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2013/05/08/adobe-kills-creative-suite-demands-monthly-subscription/#comment-36718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 16:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=5087#comment-36718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A greedy move on their part. I think this is trying to catch the people who don&#039;t upgrade every time Adobe scratches their ear. I still use my very old MS FrontPage software for making simple images. I like not having to take time to deal with software changes. If it works, it works. If Adobe had come out with something I could see myself adding to my budget I would have bought their Suite. At this rate I never will. I&#039;m not a big graphic making professional though. I just want something I can DIY for my own web graphics. If I want to try something new I will go with Gimp.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A greedy move on their part. I think this is trying to catch the people who don&#8217;t upgrade every time Adobe scratches their ear. I still use my very old MS FrontPage software for making simple images. I like not having to take time to deal with software changes. If it works, it works. If Adobe had come out with something I could see myself adding to my budget I would have bought their Suite. At this rate I never will. I&#8217;m not a big graphic making professional though. I just want something I can DIY for my own web graphics. If I want to try something new I will go with Gimp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2013/05/08/adobe-kills-creative-suite-demands-monthly-subscription/#comment-36395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 22:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=5087#comment-36395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed it is. I pretty much only use Photoshop myself (I just can&#039;t learn to like GIMP, and Pixelmator just isn&#039;t as capable). Most of their software has decent competitors.

Apple&#039;s Final Cut Pro is on the same level as Premier, and cheaper to boot. (Then there are tons of other consumer-level alternatives, from companies like Avid, Sony, Roxio, Pinnacle, etc.) After Effects is harder to find an adequate replacement for, though.

As for Dreamweaver...do people actually still use Dreamweaver? I hope not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it is. I pretty much only use Photoshop myself (I just can&#8217;t learn to like GIMP, and Pixelmator just isn&#8217;t as capable). Most of their software has decent competitors.</p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s Final Cut Pro is on the same level as Premier, and cheaper to boot. (Then there are tons of other consumer-level alternatives, from companies like Avid, Sony, Roxio, Pinnacle, etc.) After Effects is harder to find an adequate replacement for, though.</p>
<p>As for Dreamweaver&#8230;do people actually still use Dreamweaver? I hope not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolando</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2013/05/08/adobe-kills-creative-suite-demands-monthly-subscription/#comment-36387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rolando]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=5087#comment-36387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what a huge risk Adobe is taking, personally I don&#039;t like their new pricing model. There are good alternatives to come up with your own creative suite for cheap http://bit.ly/101Mt88]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a huge risk Adobe is taking, personally I don&#8217;t like their new pricing model. There are good alternatives to come up with your own creative suite for cheap <a href="http://bit.ly/101Mt88" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/101Mt88</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-05-17 03:25:33 by W3 Total Cache
-->