<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webmaster-Source &#187; blog software</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/tag/blog-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>WordPress vs. Movable Type: Who&#8217;s Winning?</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/07/25/wordpress-vs-movable-type-whos-winning/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/07/25/wordpress-vs-movable-type-whos-winning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software & Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movable type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hendry Lee of BlogBuildingU recently published an article comparing WordPress 2.5 and the latest version of Six Apart&#8217;s Movable Type. It seems thought out fairly well, and seems to be fair comparision. Though a lot of people may be getting tired of this little fight, it&#8217;s not going to end soon. Movable Type was the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hendry Lee of BlogBuildingU recently published <a href="http://blogbuildingu.com/articles/wordpress-vs-movable-type">an article comparing WordPress 2.5 and the latest version of Six Apart&#8217;s Movable Type.</a> It seems thought out fairly well, and seems to be fair comparision.</p>
<p>Though a lot of people may be getting tired of this little fight, it&#8217;s not going to end soon. Movable Type was the de facto standard before WordPress came along (coupled with that period where they charged for the software) and became the more popular option. Movable Type isn&#8217;t going to go down without a fight, I can tell you that, but WordPress is a few steps ahead. They&#8217;ve built a strong community during their time as Blogging Script of Choice, and the architecture is better. To quote the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>WordPress is entirely developed in PHP, while Movable Type uses a mix of PHP and Perl (but mostly Perl).</p></blockquote>
<p>Though there are a lot of Perl fanatics out there, PHP is, in my opinion, a better language for web publishing, and is easier for newbies to grasp. Movable Type has some cool features that WordPress doesn&#8217;t, but it&#8217;s reliance on Perl is a major handicap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/07/25/wordpress-vs-movable-type-whos-winning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-06-09 16:18:40 by W3 Total Cache
-->