<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webmaster-Source &#187; Business</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/tag/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>D&amp;D Online Makes &#8220;Freemium&#8221; Model Work, Gets 500% Revenue Increase</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/04/09/dd-online-makes-freemium-model-work-gets-500-revenue-increase/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/04/09/dd-online-makes-freemium-model-work-gets-500-revenue-increase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Monetization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freemium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMORPGs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=3207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dungeons and Dragons Online, an MMORPG by Turbine, recently switched from the usual online game business model of charging a monthly subscription to a &#8220;freemium&#8221; model. Players get the game for free, but can pay for additional content or items with an in-game store. Unlike others who have tried similar ideas before, Turbine went to [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ddo.com/">Dungeons and Dragons Online</a>, an MMORPG by Turbine, recently switched from the usual online game business model of charging a monthly subscription to a &#8220;freemium&#8221; model. Players get the game for free, but can pay for additional content or items with an in-game store. Unlike others who have tried similar ideas before, Turbine went to great lengths to prevent the game from being crippled for users unable to pay for extras.</p>
<p>How did that turn out? DDO has had a 500% increase in revenue and their player base has effectively doubled. <a href="http://www.wow.com/2010/03/30/pax-east-2010-turbine-on-renting-vs-owning-in-the-mmo-market/">An interesting post over at Wow.com</a> has the full story.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Everyone can play through the content without ever getting anything  from the store, and they&#8217;ll have a fine time of it. What we&#8217;re pretty  proud of with the whole system is the fact that the player owns any  content they buy.&#8221;</p>
<p>I pressed for a bit of clarification. He obliged by likening most  subscription-based games, like WoW, to renting something. When you buy  an expansion pack for <em>WoW</em>, you only have access to that  content, or any content, while your subscription is active. If your  subscription lapses, you can&#8217;t play what you bought anymore. &#8220;If you buy  a content pack from the <em>DDO</em> store, on the other hand, it&#8217;s  yours forever, regardless of whether you&#8217;re currently subscribed or not.  If you&#8217;re normally a VIP and have a rough month financially, you can go  back to the free-play model and still play what you purchased in the  store,&#8221; Currie said.</p></blockquote>
<p>What I&#8217;m wondering now is whether we&#8217;ll be seeing Turbine try to apply the same model to some of their other games, such as <em>Lord of the Rings Online</em>? (LOTR Online is sold in retail stores, and operates with a fee structure very similar to <em>World of Warcraft</em>&#8216;s, so it doesn&#8217;t seem all that likely.) <strong>What effect will this have on the gaming industry, or on the content industry in general over time?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/04/09/dd-online-makes-freemium-model-work-gets-500-revenue-increase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blockbuster to Still Get New Releases, While Netflix and Redbox Have to Wait</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/24/blockbuster-to-still-get-new-releases-while-netflix-and-redbox-have-to-wait/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/24/blockbuster-to-still-get-new-releases-while-netflix-and-redbox-have-to-wait/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=3156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in January I mentioned that Warner Brothers was pushing Netflix and Redbox into deals where they would not receive new DVDs until 28 days after the release date. (WB being under the impression that making it more difficult to rent films will cause people to buy them instead&#8230;) I said that I disapproved of [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/01/18/dont-be-like-wb/">Back in January</a> I mentioned that Warner Brothers was pushing Netflix and Redbox into deals where they would not receive new DVDs until 28 days after the release date. (WB being under the impression that making it more difficult to rent films will cause people to buy them instead&#8230;) I said that I disapproved of that sort of customer-corralling, and thought it to be a rather bad business practice.</p>
<p>Well, it seems it&#8217;s time for an update on that&#8230;</p>
<p>Blockbuster, the decaying brick-and-mortar movie rental behemoth, <a href="http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2010/03/blockbuster-gets-deal-that-netflix-redbox-couldnt.ars">will still be getting their new releases as they come out</a>. The deal inked with Warner Brothers doesn&#8217;t just give Blockbuster a competitive edge to prop-up their failing business with, but it may mean that Blockbuster will be the <em>only</em> rental service to have new releases on their launch date.</p>
<blockquote><p>In its announcement, Warner reaffirmed its commitment to assuring that  Blockbuster remains the &#8220;only multichannel provider that has every hot  new movie on the day of its release.&#8221; Indeed, with the agreements it  struck with more innovative and competitive movie rental services like  Netflix and Redbox, Blockbuster really is the only mainstream way for  people to get movies on release day without buying them.</p></blockquote>
<p>Can you say <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antitrust#United_States_antitrust">antitrust</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/24/blockbuster-to-still-get-new-releases-while-netflix-and-redbox-have-to-wait/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Group Interview of Designers on Personal Projects</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/05/06/group-interview-of-designers-on-personal-projects/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/05/06/group-interview-of-designers-on-personal-projects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 11:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=2125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DesignM.ag recently interviewed eight designers in a fantastic group interview. Chris Coyier, Collis Ta’eed, Todd Garland, Jon Phillips, Chris Spooner, Adii Pienaar, Jacob Gube, and Adelle Charles gave their answers to a series of questions, most of them about personal projects. Many designers and developers get the itch to work on their own projects in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DesignM.ag recently interviewed eight designers in a fantastic group interview. Chris Coyier, Collis Ta’eed, Todd Garland, Jon Phillips, Chris Spooner, Adii Pienaar, Jacob Gube, and Adelle Charles gave their answers to a series of questions, most of them about personal projects.</p>
<blockquote><p>Many designers and developers get the itch to work on their own projects in addition to doing client work or a full-time job. For some this is just a creative outlet without the restrictions that come with client work or being an employee, and for others it is a chance to make an additional income. Part-time projects can even turn into a full-time income in some cases.</p></blockquote>
<p>I enjoyed the end result. It&#8217;s a very informative post, and the designers certainly had plenty to say in response to the questions. Plus, having read blog entries by many of the designers, talked with them on Twitter, and used some of their products, it was even more interesting.</p>
<p><a href="http://designm.ag/interviews/personal-projects/">Group Interview On Designers and the Pursuit of Personal Projects</a> [DesignM.ag)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/05/06/group-interview-of-designers-on-personal-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giveaway: Win 1,000 Business Cards From UPrinting</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/03/08/giveaway-win-1000-business-cards-from-uprinting/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/03/08/giveaway-win-1000-business-cards-from-uprinting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=1904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Readers of Webmaster-Source, listen up! UPrinting, a cheap business card printing company that I&#8217;ve found to be of good quality, has offered to give 1,000 business cards each to two people from our community. Two winners will be chosen at random from those who comment before the deadline of March 15. (Midnight, EST.) How to [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright size-full wp-image-1905" title="UPrinting Logo" alt="UPrinting Logo" src="//www.webmaster-source.com/wp-content/uploads/uprinting.jpg" width="270" height="79" />Readers of Webmaster-Source, listen up! UPrinting, a <a href="http://www.uprinting.com/Business-Cards.html" rel="nofollow">cheap business card printing</a> company that I&#8217;ve found to be of good quality, has offered to give <strong>1,000 business cards each to two people</strong> from our community.</p>
<p>Two winners will be chosen at random from those who comment before the <strong>deadline of March 15</strong>. (Midnight, EST.)</p>
<h3>How to Enter</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Leave a comment on this post,</strong> from the form at the bottom, telling us why you want the business cards, and what you will use them for. Will you promote your website by tacking them up on bulletin boards? Will you carry them around with you at a convention or conference?</li>
<li>Be sure to <strong>leave a valid email address</strong> so we can contact you and see that you receive the business cards.</li>
<li>Optionally move to the United States or Canada if you don&#8217;t already live there. UPrinting will charge a shipping fee if you reside outside of either country. <img src="https://www.webmaster-source.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-1904"></span>The two winners will receive a thousand business cards apiece, printed on any of the available paper stocks. The winners will be chosen randomly and the winners notified by March 16th.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used UPrinting before, and they do <a href="http://www.uprinting.com/Business-Cards.html" rel="nofollow">great business cards</a>. The colors were good, and the stock was of good quality. They were quick about making the cards up and sending them too.</p>
<p>So, <strong>what would you do with 1,000 business cards?</strong> Tell us, and you just might be able to carry out your plans&#8230;</p>
<h3>Edit: And the winners are&#8230;</h3>
<p>I assigned each entrant a number, based on the order of the comments, and used <a href="http://random.org">Random.org</a> to pick the winners. Congratulations to</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://stevenclark.com.au/">Steven Clark</a></li>
<li><a href="http://news.runtowin.com/">Blaine Moore</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/03/08/giveaway-win-1000-business-cards-from-uprinting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Website Mergers</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/05/29/on-website-mergers/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/05/29/on-website-mergers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s with the merger mania? A lot of good websites have been acquired recently, and let&#8217;s not forget the infamous Microhoo&#8230; CNET was acquired by CBS, Ars Technica was absorbed by Condé Nast, owner of Reddit, Wired, and Webmonkey, and countless other web companies have met similar fates. This is worrying. Big corporations are swallowing [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with the merger mania? A lot of good websites have been acquired recently, and let&#8217;s not forget the infamous <a href="http://news.cnet.com/Microsofts-big-bid-for-Yahoo/2009-1028_3-6228762.html">Microhoo</a>&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://cnet.com">CNET</a> was acquired by CBS, <a href="http://arstechnica.com">Ars Technica</a> was absorbed by Condé Nast, owner of <a href="http://reddit.com">Reddit</a>, Wired, and Webmonkey, and countless other web companies have met similar fates.</p>
<p>This is worrying. Big corporations are swallowing good websites, and the future is foggy when it comes to what will happen to the sites. When a big media company buys out another company, it often ends in the purchased company no longer being what it once was.</p>
<p>Condé Nast has said that they don&#8217;t want to meddle in Ars Technica&#8217;s affairs too much, but what about CNET? CBS isn&#8217;t likely to sit back and let them continue on as before. Sure, they didn&#8217;t ruin Last.fm when they bought them, but I&#8217;m unsure whether we&#8217;ll see the same treatment with CNET. I hope they don&#8217;t ruin the site, but there&#8217;s a good chance that won&#8217;t be the case. As someone on Digg pointed out, the $1.8 Billion CBS paid for CNET is a bargain for their domains alone. News.com, com.com, mp3.com, download.com, etc. CBS is a big corporation that has shown that they mainly care about money. They could very well sell-off some of the domains, or put them to new use. (One notable example would be puttung News.com to use for non-tech news.) There are plenty of things that they could do to ruin the site (fire the employees that make CNET, well, CNET, bringing in tech-ignorant people as replacements, comes to mind&#8230;)<span id="more-569"></span></p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s safe to say I don&#8217;t like seeing websites acquired right and left by large corporations. There are always significant odds that the site won&#8217;t be as good as it was before the acquisition, if it lasts at all. And I don&#8217;t want the internet to be controlled by a handful of monster-sized companies. Imagine if the only ISP available was Comcast, you could only get webhosting from Dreamhost, and CBS and Fox owned all of the web&#8217;s news sites and social networks. Oh, and you would have to use Internet Explorer, on Windows of course, too. That&#8217;s where we could be heading.</p>
<p>So, if you one day you have a successful site and a large company offers you a considerably large sum of money, resist it. First, say forget it. If they keep pestering you, demand an unthinkable sum of money, much higher than their initial offer (good bargaining advice, too&#8230;). Say you want $12 Billion when they only offered $1.2 Billion. That should scare them away. If not, take the money and go launch a competing site. (Oh, and if you&#8217;re a publicly traded company, keep tabs on your stock to prevent hostile takeovers. Google seems to be good at this.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/05/29/on-website-mergers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-05-20 14:55:52 by W3 Total Cache
-->