<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webmaster-Source &#187; CAPTCHAs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/tag/captchas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Google Buys reCAPTCHA</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/09/21/google-buys-recaptcha/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/09/21/google-buys-recaptcha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services and Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPTCHAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=2567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has acquired reCAPTCHA, the service that powers some of those squiggly-letter fields (or CAPTCHAs) you have to fill out before submitting a form. (This is usually done to hinder bots attempting to mass-submit the forms for purposes such as spamming.) The interesting part of reCAPTCHA is where they get their squiggly letters from. The [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://recaptcha.net/"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2568" title="reCAPTCHA" src="//www.webmaster-source.com/wp-content/uploads/recaptcha_large.jpg" alt="reCAPTCHA" width="535" height="216" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/teaching-computers-to-read-google.html">Google has acquired reCAPTCHA,</a> the service that powers some of those squiggly-letter fields (or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captcha">CAPTCHAs</a>) you have to fill out before submitting a form. (This is usually done to hinder bots attempting to mass-submit the forms for purposes such as spamming.)</p>
<p>The interesting part of reCAPTCHA is where they get their squiggly letters from. The words are from (public domain) books and newspapers that have been scanned. As computers are bad at interpreting images and finding the words within, the scans are chopped-up and served-up through reCAPTCHA, where users help translate the images into plain text. This is done by showing two words, one that reCAPTCHA knows the plaintext for and one it doesn&#8217;t. If you type the known word properly, the CAPTCHA validates and the input for the second word is logged.</p>
<blockquote><p>reCAPTCHA’s unique technology improves the process that converts scanned images into plain text, known as Optical Character Recognition (OCR). This technology also powers large scale text scanning projects like Google Books and Google News Archive Search. Having the text version of documents is important because plain text can be searched, easily rendered on mobile devices and displayed to visually impaired users. So we&#8217;ll be applying the technology within Google not only to increase fraud and spam protection for Google products but also to improve our books and newspaper scanning process.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/09/21/google-buys-recaptcha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safer Contact Forms Without CAPTCHAs</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/06/10/safer-contact-forms-without-captchas/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/06/10/safer-contact-forms-without-captchas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPTCHAs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is by no means a new post (May 2006), but it&#8217;s still relevant. Nobody likes CAPTCHAs. It can be hard to decipher the letters and they&#8217;re annoying. They help keep the spam down though. Well, there&#8217;s a better solution than forcing people to enter twisted letters and numbers into a form. JavaScript. The modern [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is by no means a new post (May 2006), but it&#8217;s still relevant. Nobody likes CAPTCHAs. It can be hard to decipher the letters and they&#8217;re annoying. They help keep the spam down though.</p>
<p>Well, there&#8217;s a better solution than forcing people to enter twisted letters and numbers into a form. JavaScript. The modern web pretty much doesn&#8217;t work without JavaScript, so people have pretty much stopped turning it off (the few that do are wackos who wish the web was still the way it was back in the days of the MOSAIC browser).</p>
<p><a href="http://15daysofjquery.com/safer-contact-forms-without-captchas/11/">Safer Contact Forms Without CAPTCHA’s</a></p>
<p>15 Days of jQuery&#8217;s tutorial teaches how to implement an interesting technique that uses JavaScript to generate unique strings that are verified in the form processing script on the server. If the strings are null or false, the script denies the client access. It&#8217;s not foolproof, of course, no anti-spam solution is, but it&#8217;s a great deterrent, and a far less annoying one than CAPTCHA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/06/10/safer-contact-forms-without-captchas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlogBuzz March 1, 2008</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/03/01/blogbuzz-march-1-2008/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/03/01/blogbuzz-march-1-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BlogBuzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPTCHAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress Plugins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/03/01/blogbuzz-march-1-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft to launch beta of Internet Explorer 8 &#8211; Internet Exploder 8 is coming soon. Is Microsoft even listening to our protests about the &#60;meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=8" /&#62; meta tag? I will be talking about this insidious new &#8220;feature&#8221; more in-depth sometime in the next few days. 99 Sites ALL Designers Must Know About &#8211; [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9877885-7.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">Microsoft to launch beta of Internet Explorer 8</a> &#8211; Internet Exploder 8 is coming soon. Is Microsoft even listening to our protests about the <code>&lt;meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=8" /&gt;</code> meta tag? I will be talking about this insidious new &#8220;feature&#8221; more in-depth sometime in the next few days.</li>
<li><a href="http://justcreativedesign.com/2008/02/25/99-graphic-design-resources/">99 Sites ALL Designers Must Know About</a> &#8211; There are plenty of familiar sites in this list, and quite a few ones that are new to me. The post lives up to its title; If you&#8217;re a designer, or an aspiring designer, then this post is definitely worth a look.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.skelliewag.org/whats-it-like-to-run-a-popular-blog-236.htm">What’s it Like to Run a Popular Blog?</a> &#8211; &#8220;Running a well-established blog, while challenging, is very much worth it. It takes a lot of hard work to achieve, though — and a lot of time.&#8221;</li>
<li><a href="http://webhypes.com/blogging/improvement/15-wordpress-plugins-that-a-professional-blog-should-install">15 WordPress plugins that a professional blog should install</a> &#8211; I use several of these plugins, though this post has encouraged me to try a few others. Oh, and I&#8217;m sure you can guess what the first one on the list is&#8230;</li>
<li><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080226-bad-flavor-icann-network-solutions-sued-for-domain-tasting.html">Bad flavor: ICANN, Network Solutions sued for domain tasting</a> &#8211; Why ICANN? Network Solutions was the one <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_tasting">tasting</a> the domains. Why should ICANN be responsible for a registrar&#8217;s nefarious activity?</li>
<li><a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/02/26/navigation-menus-trends-and-examples/">Navigation Menus: Trends and Examples</a> &#8211; Navigational inspiration, Smashing-style.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.joostdevalk.nl/wordpress-25-plugin-settings-pages-style-guide/">WordPress 2.5 Plugin Settings Pages Style Guide</a> &#8211; If you&#8217;re a plugin developer, you may want to see this post.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.fadtastic.net/2008/02/12/25-ways-to-improve-your-site-in-5-minutes/">25 Ways To Improve Your Site In 5 Minutes</a></li>
<li>Voting has started for the <a href="http://www.webware.com/html/ww/100/2008/index.html">2008 Webware 100 Awards</a>. Be sure to vote for WordPress!</li>
<li><a href="http://www.johnmwillis.com/other/top-10-worst-captchas/">Top 10 Worst Captchas</a> &#8211; Don&#8217;t make your Captchas like these ones!</li>
<li><a href="http://www.thebigwordproject.com/">The Big Word Project</a> &#8211; Another innovative concept along the lines of the notorious Million Dollar Homepage. It&#8217;s a dictionary of sorts, where, for $1 per letter, your site can be the new definition of the word. Instead of linking to a normal dictionary definition, the word will link to your site instead. Too bad the words I would consider buying aren&#8217;t in their so-called dictionary&#8230;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/16-03/ff_free?currentPage=all">Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/02/29/best-of-february-2008/">Smashing Magazine Best Of February 2008</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/03/01/blogbuzz-march-1-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-06-09 00:07:20 by W3 Total Cache
-->