<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webmaster-Source &#187; CNET</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/tag/cnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Design Spotlight: CNET</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/09/01/design-spotlight-cnet/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/09/01/design-spotlight-cnet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Spotlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNET Networks, the long-time and respected tech source that was recently acquired by CBS, has finally released their new design to the general public. When mockups were posted a few months ago, there was public outcry. I didn&#8217;t like it either. The design has come a long way since then, and I think it&#8217;s a [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNET Networks, the long-time and respected tech source that was recently acquired by CBS, has finally released their new design to the general public. When <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13953_3-9974373-80.html">mockups were posted</a> a few months ago, there was public outcry. <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13953_3-9974373-80.html">I didn&#8217;t like it either.</a> The design has come a long way since then, and I think it&#8217;s a worthy successor to the old design.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="CNET Redesign" src="http://i33.tinypic.com/sdpshz.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="248" /></p>
<p><span id="more-780"></span>The redesign turned out pretty good, and I&#8217;m happy with it. I visit CNET a bit, seeing as I&#8217;m an avid listener of the <a href="http://bol.cnet.com">Buzz Out Loud</a> podcast, and they&#8217;re not a bad source for news or product reviews either. I think it was a mistake on their part to release early mockups like that. They bear little similarity to the final result, and caused undue panic.</p>
<p>The new version looks good, and it seems a touch cleaner than the old. There is some yellow still, but far less than the glaring yellow that people complained made their &#8220;eyeballs bleed.&#8221; The main page has a better layout, and there is more useful information on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/09/01/design-spotlight-cnet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-06-09 04:18:36 by W3 Total Cache
-->