<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webmaster-Source &#187; Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/tag/facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Blogs are the Next Big Social Network</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2012/07/24/blogs-are-the-next-big-social-network/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2012/07/24/blogs-are-the-next-big-social-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=4757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do people use Facebook? What does it offer, besides an enormous user base, that makes it such an attractive internet destination? At it&#8217;s core, it&#8217;s just a tool for sharing short posts. Twitter and Tumblr also accomplish the same thing, for the most part. Blogs can do everything Facebook or Twitter can do, though [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people use Facebook? What does it offer, besides an enormous user base, that makes it such an attractive internet destination? At it&#8217;s core, it&#8217;s just a tool for sharing short posts. Twitter and Tumblr also accomplish the same thing, for the most part.</p>
<p><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright size-full wp-image-4761" title="Social Network" src="//www.webmaster-source.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/photodune-2212972-social-network-xs.png" alt="" width="244" height="163" />Blogs can do everything Facebook or Twitter can do, though they lack the centralization. You have to manually go out and visit them to see what&#8217;s new, or use RSS, which isn&#8217;t exactly intuitive to less technical users. Blogs are, in their barest form, a reverse-chronological listing of postings. Those posts can be of any length, and contain any type of information. Plain text, images, audio, video, etc.. Some platforms, like WordPress and Tumblr, even offer features to differentiate between types of posts. Photo galleries? You can even do that if you set it up right. Profiles? That&#8217;s what About pages are for.</p>
<p>The only thing that&#8217;s missing is <em>a standardized federation API</em> that broadcasts information about a blog, linking them together so you can have user-friendly news feeds like Facebook or Twitter. The API would include basic profile information, such as your name and the URL of your chosen avatar, the URL of the blog, and anything else that a social networking would need to query.<span id="more-4757"></span></p>
<p>Using that information, a user could skim through their friends&#8217; latest updates from a convenient dashboard. It would pull in information from the federation API and aggregate public posts.</p>
<p><a href="http://wordpress.com/">WordPress.com</a> is already doing something along these lines, only it&#8217;s internal to their hosted service. You can &#8220;follow&#8221; a WordPress.com blog, and its posts end up in a news feed of sorts. Imagine if it became a part of the open source WordPress project as well, and <em>any</em> WordPress blog could be followed in the same way. And if it was later opened up and inter-operated with other platforms as well. You could even follow non-personal sites such as <a href="http://smashingmagazine.com">Smashing Magazine</a>, much like you would a &#8220;fan page&#8221; on Facebook.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  class="aligncenter  wp-image-4758 imgborder" title="WordPress.com &quot;Reader&quot;" src="//www.webmaster-source.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/wordpresscomnewsfeed.png" alt="" width="600" height="279" /></p>
<p>Just add remote replies, so you can comment on a post without traipsing over to the other user&#8217;s site, and you&#8217;ve got a social network. You could even have mobile apps. WordPress and Blogger have had XML-RPC APIs for a long time, and the WordPress team even made an iPhone app for on-the-go posting an comment moderation. Add the aggregation into the mix, and you basically have Twitter or Tumblr, but more open.</p>
<p>Given the extensibility of the more popular blogging platforms, WordPress especially, it wouldn&#8217;t be out of the question to handle it as a downloadable plugin. The idea would probably gain more traction if the Automattic team was on board, though, and integrated it with WordPress.com.</p>
<p>Forget Google Plus or Diaspora, the future is going to be even more open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2012/07/24/blogs-are-the-next-big-social-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adding and Tracking Social Buttons</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/07/15/adding-and-tracking-social-buttons/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/07/15/adding-and-tracking-social-buttons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(x)html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widgets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=4140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like every website has social media buttons on them now. The ones leading the pack of late seem to be Twitter, Google +1 and the Facebook Like widget. This introduces one problem: loading times. Your pages are calling JavaScript files hosted on remote servers, bogging them down a bit. Joost de Valk has [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like every website has social media buttons on them now. The ones leading the pack of late seem to be Twitter, Google +1 and the Facebook Like widget. This introduces one problem: loading times. Your pages are calling JavaScript files hosted on remote servers, bogging them down a bit.</p>
<p>Joost de Valk has put together <a href="http://yoast.com/social-buttons/">a good tutorial on how to fix that issue</a>. It features code snippets that will load the widget JavaScript asynchronously, keeping the buttons from holding up the page loading. Also, it even adds Google Analytics and Clicky tracking so you can tell if people are actually using your buttons.</p>
<blockquote><p>When Google released +1, I quickly identified <a href="http://yoast.com/plus-one-google-analytics/">how to track interaction with that button</a>.  The obvious &#8220;follow up&#8221; was questions from people on how to track  interaction with other buttons. Not for each of these social buttons  tracking of interaction is actually possible. It depends on how the  button was designed whether this will work or not. I got it working for  Twitter and Facebook, so I&#8217;ll share the code for tracking interaction  with their respective social buttons below.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://yoast.com/social-buttons/">Social Buttons: Adding them to your site &amp; Tracking them</a> [Yoast]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/07/15/adding-and-tracking-social-buttons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Twitter and Facebook Link Statistics with JSON and jQuery</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/06/24/get-twitter-and-facebook-link-statistics-with-json-and-jquery/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/06/24/get-twitter-and-facebook-link-statistics-with-json-and-jquery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jquery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[json]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=4076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both Twitter and Facebook have little JavaScript widgets that allow you to share a page using the respective service, displaying a running total of users who have done so. While that&#8217;s fine for most purposes, what if you just need the count, for some atypical application? It&#8217;s not well-documented, but the two social media sites [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Twitter and Facebook have little JavaScript widgets that allow you to share a page using the respective service, displaying a running total of users who have done so. While that&#8217;s fine for most purposes, what if you just need the count, for some atypical application?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not well-documented, but the two social media sites have JSON APIs for that purpose.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://urls.api.twitter.com/1/urls/count.json?url=http://xkcd.com/792/"><code>http://urls.api.twitter.com/1/urls/count.json?url=THE_URL</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://graph.facebook.com/http://xkcd.com/792/"><code>https://graph.facebook.com/THE_URL</code></a></li>
</ul>
<p>With a little bit of jQuery magic, you can collect the values on page load and update the DOM with the number. Here&#8217;s something I threw together for a project I was working on:</p>
<pre class="brush: jscript; title: ; notranslate">
(function() {

var url = 'http://xkcd.com/792/';

jQuery.getJSON(&quot;http://urls.api.twitter.com/1/urls/count.json?url=&quot;+url+&quot;&amp;callback=?&quot;, function(data) {
jQuery('#socialstuff span.twcount').html(data.count);
});

jQuery.getJSON(&quot;https://graph.facebook.com/&quot;+url+&quot;&amp;callback=?&quot;, function(data) {
jQuery('#socialstuff span.fbcount').html(data.shares);
});

}());
</pre>
<p>As long as you remember to include jQuery, and have the right HTML elements for the JavaScript to populate, it&#8217;s pretty much plug-and-play.</p>
<p>You can <a href="http://www.webmaster-source.com/static/demos/jsonsocialcounts.php">see it in action here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/06/24/get-twitter-and-facebook-link-statistics-with-json-and-jquery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Privacy Scanning Bookmarklet</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/05/26/facebook-privacy-scanning-bookmarklet/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/05/26/facebook-privacy-scanning-bookmarklet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 11:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=3342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless you&#8217;ve been living under an internet-devoid rock, you have probably noticed the recent uproar over Facebook &#8220;privacy.&#8221; The social media giant made some changes, with various confusing privacy implications that have everyone panicking. By default applications can access some personal details (that you might not want them to be able to access) simply because [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless you&#8217;ve been living under an internet-devoid rock, you have probably noticed the recent uproar over Facebook &#8220;privacy.&#8221; The social media giant made some changes, with various confusing privacy implications that have everyone panicking. By default applications can access some personal details (that you might not want them to be able to access) simply because one of your friends has used the application. Then there&#8217;s the relatively harmless &#8220;Instant Personalization&#8221; feature, which lets a select group of sites pull profile data to customize your experience&#8230;but only if you agree to it on a site-by-site basis. (A lot of people have freaked-out over the new JavaScript widgets as well, even though they&#8217;re built entirely on the client side rather than the server, meaning Facebook is the only party seeing the contents.)</p>
<p>The good news is that there&#8217;s now <a href="http://www.reclaimprivacy.org/">an open-source bookmarklet</a> that can scan your profile and recommend tweaks to lock-down your profile a bit, since Facebook&#8217;s privacy settings are so byzantine that few have the patience to wade through them. ReclaimPrivacy.org&#8217;s script runs a series of tests and gives you a convenient button to fix the problem if you so choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/05/26/facebook-privacy-scanning-bookmarklet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Facebook Just Patent Twitter?</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/03/did-facebook-just-patent-twitter/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/03/did-facebook-just-patent-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=3086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook was just granted a patent for something that should prove to be controversial. Patent #7,669,123, which was filed for in 2006, is for &#8220;A method for displaying a news feed in a social network environment&#8230;&#8221; The abstract reads: A method for displaying a news feed in a social network environment is described. The method [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://facebook.com">Facebook</a> was just granted a patent for something that should prove to be controversial. Patent #7,669,123, which was filed for in 2006, is for &#8220;A method for displaying a news feed in a social network environment&#8230;&#8221; The abstract reads:</p>
<blockquote><p>A method for displaying a news feed in a social network environment is      described. The method includes generating news items regarding  activities      associated with a user of a social network environment and  attaching an      informational link associated with at least one of the activities,  to at      least one of the news items, as well as limiting access to the news  items      to a predetermined set of viewers and assigning an order to the  news      items. The method further may further include displaying the news  items      in the assigned order to at least one viewing user of the  predetermined      set of viewers and dynamically limiting the number of news items      displayed.</p></blockquote>
<p>It sounds to me like they just patented a fairly obvious mechanism that has been long used by sites like Twitter, Digg, Reddit, RSS readers, blogs, etc..</p>
<p>Am I the only one who isn&#8217;t okay with this sort of patent-trolling behavior? Why does the USPTO keep letting these kinds of application through? It&#8217;s bad enough that Amazon is still fighting to have their <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20100223/0249208265.shtml">one-click buying patent</a> approved, and now we have another stupid patent that is just too <em>obvious.</em> Facebook is by no means the first website to have a &#8220;news feed,&#8221; and the idea is hardly patent-worthy.</p>
<p><a href="http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2010/02/26/facebook-patented-feed/">Facebook Just Patented The Feed – What Does That Mean For Everyone That Uses Them?</a> [TheNextWeb]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/03/did-facebook-just-patent-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Announces HipHop for PHP</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/02/03/facebook-announces-hiphop-for-php/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/02/03/facebook-announces-hiphop-for-php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HipHop for PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=3012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PHP is my favorite server-side programming language, but it has one major Achilles&#8217; heel: speed. A language that is interpreted by the server at load time can&#8217;t hope to compete with a compiled language for speed. That&#8217;s what Facebook&#8217;s new project, &#8220;HipHop for PHP,&#8221; aims to solve. HipHop converts PHP scripts to C++ code and [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PHP is my favorite server-side programming language, but it has one major Achilles&#8217; heel: speed. A language that is interpreted by the server at load time can&#8217;t hope to compete with a compiled language for speed. That&#8217;s what Facebook&#8217;s new project, &#8220;HipHop for PHP,&#8221; aims to solve. HipHop converts PHP scripts to C++ code and then uses g++ to compile it. This brings a CPU usage decrease of up to 50%, according to the announcement.</p>
<blockquote><p>One night at a Hackathon a few years ago (see Prime  Time Hack), I started my first piece of code transforming PHP into  C++.  The languages are fairly similar syntactically and C++ drastically  outperforms PHP when it comes to both CPU and memory usage.  Even PHP  itself is written in C.  We knew that it was impossible to successfully  rewrite an entire codebase of this size by hand, but wondered what would  happen if we built a system to do it programmatically.</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting, for sure. Imagine using it with WordPress for a high-traffic blog&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://developers.facebook.com/news.php?story=358&amp;blog=1">HipHop for PHP: Move Fast</a> [Facebook Developer Blog]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/02/03/facebook-announces-hiphop-for-php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-04-29 11:34:56 by W3 Total Cache
-->