<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webmaster-Source &#187; GoDaddy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/tag/godaddy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>GoDaddy Acquires Media Temple</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2013/10/15/godaddy-acquires-media-temple/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2013/10/15/godaddy-acquires-media-temple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=5217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope you&#8217;re not a Media Temple customer, because I have bad news. GoDaddy has just acquired the hosting company, according to the press release they put out today. SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. (Oct. 15, 2013) &#8212; GoDaddy, the Web&#8217;s largest platform for small businesses, has acquired (mt) Media Temple, a Los Angeles-based Web hosting and cloud [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you&#8217;re not a Media Temple customer, because I have bad news. GoDaddy has just acquired the hosting company, according to the press release they put out today.</p>
<blockquote><p>SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. (Oct. 15, 2013) &#8212; GoDaddy, the Web&#8217;s largest platform for small businesses, has acquired (mt) Media Temple, a Los Angeles-based Web hosting and cloud services company focused on the creative class of digital designers, developers, entrepreneurs and innovators.</p>
<p>The two companies will continue to operate independently. The strategic acquisition provides GoDaddy with direct access to Media Temple&#8217;s hosting gurus, who will share knowledge and insight on how GoDaddy can better serve Web professionals and developers. GoDaddy provides scale and investment for (mt) to accelerate its growth and further expand internationally.</p></blockquote>
<p>Media Temple is a popular option for Linux-challenged web designers seeking managed hosting with a friendly control panel, though they pay significantly more for the convenience. Though <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=godaddy+sucks">that may change</a> as GoDaddy&#8217;s influence permeates their acquisition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2013/10/15/godaddy-acquires-media-temple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ditching GoDaddy? Here Are Some Alternatives</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2012/09/11/ditching-godaddy-here-are-some-alternatives/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2012/09/11/ditching-godaddy-here-are-some-alternatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shared hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=4829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether it’s because of the recent major outage, their brazen support for SOPA, or their longstanding questionable business practices, there are many reasons one may wish to avoid doing business with GoDaddy. (Archive.org has a mirror of the old NoDaddy site if you’re curious about some of the hijinks they’ve been behind in the past.) [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it’s because of <a href="http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/09/godaddy-outage-makes-websites-unavailable-for-many-internet-users/">the recent major outage</a>, their <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/12/godaddy-faces-december-29-boycott-over-sopa-support/">brazen support for SOPA</a>, or their longstanding <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/12/godaddy_shuts_down_nodaddy/">questionable business practices</a>, there are many reasons one may wish to avoid doing business with GoDaddy. (Archive.org has <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20110627205958/http://nodaddy.com/">a mirror</a> of the old NoDaddy site if you’re curious about some of the hijinks they’ve been behind in the past.)</p>
<p>There are countless alternatives for the services GoDaddy offers, but many newbies are not too aware of them. After all, they don’t pour money into TV ads during the Superbowl.</p>
<p>Since I’m frequently asked for suggestions, I figured it would make for a good post.</p>
<h3>Domains</h3>
<p>It is usually prudent to register domain names with a separate company from the one that actually hosts your web site. That way, if you have cause to switch for one reason or other, you can simply edit the DNS to point it to your new host, and you don’t have to worry about transferring the name from one service to another.<span id="more-4829"></span></p>
<p>There are many domain registrars, but a few that are frequently recommended are:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.name.com/">Name.com</a> — Name.com recently went above and beyond to help recover <a href="http://davidwalsh.name/freedavidwalshdotname">a domain that was hijacked</a> from a web development blog. Even though the thief had transferred it away from GoDaddy and only moved it to Name.com temporarily before being shuffled over to 1and1, Name.com was the only company involved to step up and coordinate the recovery of the stolen name.</li>
<li><a href="https://www.hover.com/">Hover</a> — Hover charges a premium, but their goal is simplicity and no BS. They won’t push extra services on you when you buy a domain or clutter your admin panel up with ads.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.namecheap.com/">Namecheap</a> — A popular option, though I know less about them. A lot of the people moving away from GoDaddy during the SOPA boycotts went with Namecheap.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.1and1.com/">1and1</a> — I’ve been using 1and1 for my many domains for several years. (Since 2005 or so, maybe.) I haven’t had an issue with them so far, though some people have reported issues with their customer service department. They get a bit of flak, whether it’s warranted or not, but I have been happy with their service for about seven years.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.gandi.net/">Gandi</a> — Gandi’s motto is “no bullshit™.” They handle a large selection of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-level_domain">TLDs</a>, so they’re a good bet if you’re looking for something exotic, like a <code>.it</code>, <code>.io</code>, <code>.ly</code>, <code>.me</code>, or <code>.fm</code> domain. Their prices do vary depending on the extension, though, since country-level domains vary depending on their home nation’s policies.</li>
<li><a href="https://www.moniker.com/">Moniker</a> — I currently have one domain registered with Moniker, as I had <a href="http://www.webmaster-source.com/2012/02/22/adventures-in-buying-expiring-domains/">acquired it</a> after the previous owner allowed it to expire, and I never moved it away from Moniker. I haven’t had issue with them so far, and they’re an established name in the industry.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Shared Hosting</h3>
<p>There are three major types of web hosting services: shared, VPS and dedicated. Shared hosting is the cheapest option, and is the easiest for beginners to get started with. Basically, you share a server with many other users. Its resources are allocated equally, and everything usually works fine so long as none of the website get <em>too</em> much traffic. Things get a little more complicated then, and the host may suspend the offending web site and ask them to upgrade to a pricier service.</p>
<p>Some hosts advertise “unlimited” bandwidth, but you shouldn’t take that claim too seriously. While they may not meter your bandwidth, they will still cut you off if serving your site takes up too much CPU time. (More traffic means more requests served simultaneously, which means greater processor usage. Obviously they don’t want to impact the other sites on the server, so they suspend the site.)</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://asmallorange.com/">A Small Orange</a> — ASO aims to provide affordable and fair web hosting without overselling, a tactic that some hosts use to maximize profits, selling more accounts on a server than the hardware can handle, under the assumption that the majority of users won’t be fully utilizing what they pay for. A Small Orange is upfront about the limitations of each plan they offer. You can get a shared hosting account starting at $35/year ($2.91/month) and move up to higher plans as needed. Their $10/month plan with 5 gigabytes of storage space and 100GB of transfer is a pretty good deal, and more than enough for even a moderately popular blog. They also offer reseller, VPS and dedicated plans if you outgrow shared hosting. <a href="http://www.asmallorange.com?a_aid=webmastersource">[Affiliate Link]</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/">Nearly Free Speech</a> — What if you didn’t pay a flat monthly fee for basic web hosting? What if you only paid for what you used, and not a penny more? That’s how Nearly Free Speech works. Pricing can get a little complicated, but it can be very cheap as a result. You make a deposit, as little as $0.25, and pay as you go. Serving up static HTML isn’t going to cost much, depending entirely on how popular your site is and how much you’re storing on their servers. Dynamic sites, like WordPress blogs, start with that same baseline, but there is and additional $0.01/day dynamic site fee, and additional usage fees for your MySQL database.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.wpwebhost.com/">WP Web Host</a> — This one is well-known in the WordPress community. They specialize in hosting services for WordPress. They’re up front about their policies on the maximum system resources that you can consume under a shared plan, as well. (15% CPU, 512MB of RAM)</li>
<li><a href="http://mediatemple.net/">Media Temple</a> — Media Temple&#8217;s &#8220;Grid Service&#8221; offering, though pricier than most shared hosting services, is known for being more reliable. They use redundant server clusters that can &#8220;burst&#8221; extra resources to handle spikes in traffic. You get a 100GB storage pool and up to one terabyte of monthly network transfer. Media Temple offers a custom control panel, and one-click installs of popular software packages, such as WordPress.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Virtual Private Servers</h3>
<p>While a shared host puts many users’ sites in the same server environment, a Virtual Private Server (VPS) is more like having a dedicated server, though it is significantly cheaper. Using a technology known as virtualization, a server is partitioned into several virtual servers. Far less customers are put on one machine, so you have a much greater share of the hardware’s resources, and you also have full control over the server environment. In most cases you’re given remote access to the command line, and you can install your choice of operating system (Linux or Unix distributions, in most cases) and configure things however you want.</p>
<p>There are two varieties of service you’ll find when you purchase a VPS: managed and unmanaged. With a managed server, you give up some control in order to have the provider take care of the technical details for you, and maybe offer a friendly control panel like cPanel. With an unmanaged server, you’re given free reign over your virtual machine and little support (unless you pay extra to be rescued). If you’re familiar with Linux and don’t mind getting your hands dirty in order to retool things for your needs, an unmanaged VPS is awesome.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://asmallorange.com/">A Small Orange</a> — (See the above entry under Shared Hosting.) A Small Orange also offers VPS plans, as well as dedicated servers. Their servers are fully managed, and include a cPanel license. So they’re a good bet if you don’t want to make the leap to managing a server and editing configuration files from the command line.</li>
<li><a href="https://www.vps.net/">VPS.net</a> — My hosting provider of choice. They offer a few different services, their “cloud servers” offering being what I use. You get a scalable VPS (you can add or subtract “nodes” of resources and deploy them with a quick reboot) and unfettered access over SSH. It’s unmanaged unless you purchase optional “managed services” or one-time “do it for me” support tickets. It’s very reliable, and there are datacenters across several continents. A single-node VPS with 376MB of RAM, 10GB of disk space and 1TB of network transfer will run you $20/month. <a href="http://manage.aff.biz/z/158/CD2985/">[Affiliate Link]</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.linode.com/">Linode</a> — Linode is a well-liked option along similar lines to VPS.net. Their offerings provide good bang for the buck (a 512MB system with 20GB of storage and 200GB of transfer will cost you $19.95/month) and they’re known for their support. They also have <a href="http://library.linode.com/">a nice collection of tutorials,</a> which I have referred to in the past, even though I’m not a customer. <img src="https://www.webmaster-source.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" /></li>
<li><a href="http://mediatemple.net/">Media Temple</a> — MT also offers virtual servers, several variations of that theme in fact. They have their VE, GS and Nitro plans, which all have their different pluses and minuses. I don&#8217;t have any personal experience with Media Temple, though they have a good reputation and I had considered them at one point.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.rackspace.com/">Rackspace</a> — Rackspace is a big player in the cloud server arena. They provide numerous services for varying needs. They host many web apps, like Amazon.</li>
<li><a href="http://aws.amazon.com/">Amazon Web Services</a> — Few names are more well known in cloud services than Amazon. Their EC2 service powers a lot of big-name web apps and social networking sites, though it is just as viable for smaller sites. They also have S3, which is good for storing and serving static files, CloudFront, their CDN, and others.</li>
</ul>
<p>Those are just a few suggestions. Whatever your needs are, there are many options out there. Be sure to shop around and look for reviews before comitting to a service.</p>
<p>A good resource for asking for advice is the <a href="http://www.webhostingtalk.com/">Web Hosting Talk</a> forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2012/09/11/ditching-godaddy-here-are-some-alternatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Despite Boycott, GoDaddy Still Supports SOPA</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/12/26/despite-boycott-godaddy-still-supports-sopa/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/12/26/despite-boycott-godaddy-still-supports-sopa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 11:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=4465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As if there weren&#8217;t enough reasons to not do business with GoDaddy, they recently made it clear that they not only support SOPA, but that they were involved in the authoring of the bill. Polis pointed out that SOPA and Smith’s amendment already excluded certain operators of sub-domains, such as GoDaddy.com, from being subject to [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if there weren&#8217;t <a href="http://antigodaddy.com/">enough reasons</a> to not do business with GoDaddy, they recently made it clear that they <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/12/godaddy-faces-december-29-boycott-over-sopa-support.ars">not only support SOPA</a>, but that they were <a href="http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/12/sopa-hearing-will-never-end.php">involved</a> in the authoring of the bill.</p>
<blockquote><p>Polis pointed out that SOPA and Smith’s amendment already excluded certain operators of sub-domains, such as GoDaddy.com, from being subject to shutdowns under SOPA.</p></blockquote>
<p>Even with that lesser-publicized fact aside, GoDaddy&#8217;s support of SOPA has spurred a large boycott, which they have met with a cavalier attitude (&#8220;we have not seen any impact to our business&#8221;) and some fuzzy PR-speak leading people to believe that they no longer support the bill, <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/12/23/godaddy-ceo-there-has-to-be-consensus-about-the-leadership-of-the-internet-community/">while they still do</a>.</p>
<p>If you are looking to leave GoDaddy, or someone you know is, there are plenty of alternatives.</p>
<p><strong>Domains:</strong> <a href="http://www.name.com/">Name.com</a>, <a href="http://www.moniker.com/">Moniker</a>, <a href="http://www.gandi.net/">Gandi.net</a>, <a href="https://www.hover.com/">Hover (Tucows)</a>, <a href="http://1and1.com/">1and1</a></p>
<p><strong>Shared Hosting:</strong> <a href="http://www.hostgator.com/">HostGator</a>, <a href="http://mediatemple.net/">Media Temple</a>, <a href="http://www.site5.com/">Site5</a>, <a href="http://www.wpwebhost.com/">WPWebHost</a>, <a href="http://asmallorange.com/">A Small Orange</a>, <a href="https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/">Nearly Free Speech </a></p>
<p><strong>VPS Hosting:</strong> <a href="http://vps.net/">VPS.net</a>, <a href="http://www.linode.com/">Linode</a>, <a href="http://mediatemple.net/">Media Temple</a>, <a href="http://www.rackspace.com/">Rackspace</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/12/26/despite-boycott-godaddy-still-supports-sopa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Hijackers Hit Design and Development Blogs</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/12/05/domain-hijackers-hit-design-and-development-blogs/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/12/05/domain-hijackers-hit-design-and-development-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=4426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a sudden outbreak of design and development blogs having their domain names hijacked and held for ransom. It seems to have started with David Walsh&#8217;s site, when his domain name was mysteriously transferred from GoDaddy to Name.com and from there to 1and1. The DNS records have been pointed back to Walsh&#8217;s host [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a sudden outbreak of design and development blogs having their domain names hijacked and held for ransom. It seems to have <a href="http://davidwalsh.name/domain-stolen">started with David Walsh&#8217;s site</a>, when his domain name was mysteriously transferred from GoDaddy to Name.com and from there to 1and1. The DNS records have been pointed back to Walsh&#8217;s host by 1and1 while things are sorted out, but for now the domain is still not under his control.</p>
<p>About one day later, <a href="http://css-tricks.com/15377-this-sites-domain-is-stolen/">the same thing happened</a> to Chris Coyier&#8217;s CSS-Tricks.com. Someone gained access to his GMail and GoDaddy accounts and moved the domain to PlanetDomain. From his detailed chronicle of the events, it&#8217;s a possibility that he may have a keylogger on his computer, as the miscreant has been able to get around password resets of the GMail account, and may have even accessed the Media Temple server CSS-Tricks is hosted on. Coyier also received the impeccably-penned threat &#8220;pay 2k to get ur domain back.&#8221;</p>
<p>This has recently happened to a few other big-name sites in the same field, including Abduzeedo, Kirupa, Design Shack and InstantShift. Abduzeedo was able to catch the transfer and stop it, though. (Interestingly, it has been almost exactly four years since the same thing happened to <a href="http://www.davidairey.com/david-airey-hacked/">logo designer David Airey</a>.)</p>
<p>Just to be on the safe side, you might want to do a quick <a href="http://www.whois.net/">WHOIS</a> search on your own domain and make sure it&#8217;s still on your registrar.</p>
<p><em>Update, Dec 5:</em> Planetdomain <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/chriscoyier/status/143856882073878529">is reversing the transfer</a>, and moving the CSS-Tricks.com domain back to Chris Coyier&#8217;s GoDaddy account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2011/12/05/domain-hijackers-hit-design-and-development-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GoDaddy Now Registering .me Domains: Does Anyone Care?</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/07/23/godaddy-now-registering-me-domains-does-anyone-care/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/07/23/godaddy-now-registering-me-domains-does-anyone-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registrar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GoDaddy, one of everyone&#8217;s least favorite registrars, has started registering .me domains. At $40 for a two-year registration, they&#8217;re not the cheapest domains on the block, but there certainly are some interesting possibilities. Such as Kick.me la.me Digg.me throwabrickat.me Aweso.me give.me/some_money Could be fun, right? Too bad, GoDaddy doesn&#8217;t like it when you have fun. [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GoDaddy, one of everyone&#8217;s <a href="http://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/07/04/nodaddycom-exposing-the-many-reasons-not-to-trust-godaddy-with-your-domain-names/">least favorite registrars</a>, has <a href="http://mashable.com/2008/07/17/godaddy-offers-me-domain-names-it%E2%80%99s-a-big-fail-so-far/">started registering .me domains</a>. At $40 for a two-year registration, they&#8217;re not the cheapest domains on the block, but there certainly are some interesting possibilities. Such as</p>
<ul>
<li>Kick.me</li>
<li>la.me</li>
<li>Digg.me</li>
<li>throwabrickat.me</li>
<li>Aweso.me</li>
<li>give.me/some_money</li>
</ul>
<p>Could be fun, right? Too bad, GoDaddy doesn&#8217;t like it when you have fun.</p>
<p>GoDaddy has already taken most of the &#8220;good&#8221; ones and put them up for auction. And then there are issues with multiple people trying to register a domain, all of them being charged and recieving reciepts, but only one getting the domain in the end (asssuming GoDaddy doesn&#8217;t just sit on the domain).</p>
<p>So&#8230; We have a new TLD with potentially cool naming possibilities, but GoDaddy screws it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/07/23/godaddy-now-registering-me-domains-does-anyone-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-05-26 07:55:50 by W3 Total Cache
-->