<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webmaster-Source &#187; patent</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/tag/patent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>U.S. Patent Office Awards Amazon 1-Click Patent</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/18/us-patent-office-awards-amazon-1-click-patent/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/18/us-patent-office-awards-amazon-1-click-patent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=3123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1997, Amazon filed for the infamous &#8220;1-Click Patent,&#8221; a &#8220;Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network&#8221; using a single click. Now, many companies other than Amazon use that exact same paradigm, some of them may have even been using it before Amazon. ITunes, for instance, stores your credit information [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1997, Amazon filed for the infamous &#8220;1-Click Patent,&#8221; a &#8220;Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications  network&#8221; using a single click.</p>
<p>Now, many companies other than Amazon use that exact same paradigm, some of them may have even been using it before Amazon. ITunes, for instance, stores your credit information so you can instantly buy songs with a single click, and a confirmation dialog, rather than wasting your time with a virtual &#8220;shopping cart.&#8221;</p>
<p>The U.S. Patent Office, in 2006, started an inquiry into the questionable nature of the filing. Unfortunately, that has ended. The patent has been confirmed, and is set to expire in 2017.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;the 1-Click patent, after Amazon&#8217;s amendments, is &#8220;a  slightly narrower version but essentially the same version.&#8221; He added:  &#8220;This case may be a public relations boon for supporters of patent  reform that have been calling for an overhaul of the reexamination  system.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What does this mean for online business? The one-click model is fairly commonplace in online commerce, particularly with services selling entertainment media.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/03/amazons_1-click_patent_confirmed_following_re-exam.html">Amazon.com&#8217;s 1-Click patent confirmed following re-exam</a> [TechFlash]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/18/us-patent-office-awards-amazon-1-click-patent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Facebook Just Patent Twitter?</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/03/did-facebook-just-patent-twitter/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/03/did-facebook-just-patent-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=3086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook was just granted a patent for something that should prove to be controversial. Patent #7,669,123, which was filed for in 2006, is for &#8220;A method for displaying a news feed in a social network environment&#8230;&#8221; The abstract reads: A method for displaying a news feed in a social network environment is described. The method [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://facebook.com">Facebook</a> was just granted a patent for something that should prove to be controversial. Patent #7,669,123, which was filed for in 2006, is for &#8220;A method for displaying a news feed in a social network environment&#8230;&#8221; The abstract reads:</p>
<blockquote><p>A method for displaying a news feed in a social network environment is      described. The method includes generating news items regarding  activities      associated with a user of a social network environment and  attaching an      informational link associated with at least one of the activities,  to at      least one of the news items, as well as limiting access to the news  items      to a predetermined set of viewers and assigning an order to the  news      items. The method further may further include displaying the news  items      in the assigned order to at least one viewing user of the  predetermined      set of viewers and dynamically limiting the number of news items      displayed.</p></blockquote>
<p>It sounds to me like they just patented a fairly obvious mechanism that has been long used by sites like Twitter, Digg, Reddit, RSS readers, blogs, etc..</p>
<p>Am I the only one who isn&#8217;t okay with this sort of patent-trolling behavior? Why does the USPTO keep letting these kinds of application through? It&#8217;s bad enough that Amazon is still fighting to have their <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20100223/0249208265.shtml">one-click buying patent</a> approved, and now we have another stupid patent that is just too <em>obvious.</em> Facebook is by no means the first website to have a &#8220;news feed,&#8221; and the idea is hardly patent-worthy.</p>
<p><a href="http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2010/02/26/facebook-patented-feed/">Facebook Just Patented The Feed – What Does That Mean For Everyone That Uses Them?</a> [TheNextWeb]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/03/03/did-facebook-just-patent-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-06-11 04:29:49 by W3 Total Cache
-->