<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webmaster-Source &#187; PayPal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/tag/paypal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Are Unicode Domains Really a Security Risk?</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/01/11/are-unicode-domains-really-a-security-risk/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/01/11/are-unicode-domains-really-a-security-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PayPal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=2910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently read an interesting piece from Mashable that suggested that ICANN allowing non-Latin (Unicode) domain names is a security risk. The problem is that Unicode characters can be rendered in browsers as Latin characters, which opens a new window of opportunity for phishers. If the domain, created using Cyrillic scripts “raural.com” was registered, the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently read an interesting piece from Mashable that suggested that<a href="http://mashable.com/2010/01/01/idn-phishing/"> ICANN allowing non-Latin (Unicode) domain names is a security risk</a>. The problem is that Unicode characters can be rendered in browsers as Latin characters, which opens a new window of opportunity for phishers.</p>
<blockquote><p>If the domain, created using Cyrillic scripts “raural.com” was registered, the way that Unicode-browsers will actually render that domain in latin is as “paypal.com.” In theory, phishers could pass around that link and set up a fake version of the PayPal site to harvest logins and credit card data.</p></blockquote>
<p>It is impossible to tell the difference visually. It&#8217;s pretty scary. At least, I thought it was until I realized two things:</p>
<ol>
<li>You shouldn&#8217;t click links in emails claiming to be from PayPal or your bank <em>anyway.</em> Just don&#8217;t. Type the address in manually.</li>
<li>Websites dealing with money, or other things that require a higher level of security, generally have an SSL certificate signed by a reputable third party.</li>
</ol>
<p>So if you don&#8217;t click links in emails, and make sure that the SSL certificate checks-out, you&#8217;ll be safe.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2911 imgborder" title="Viewing SSL Certificate Details in Firefox" src="//www.webmaster-source.com/wp-content/uploads/ssl-certificate-paypal.jpg" alt="" width="376" height="294" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that big a deal for those of us who have a good general knowledge of computer security, but it still is worrying that phishers are gaining this tool. I&#8217;m sure you know plenty of people who could easily fall into this kind of trap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2010/01/11/are-unicode-domains-really-a-security-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PayPal Goes Down For 4.5 Hours, What Does This Mean For Business?</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/08/05/paypal-outage-business/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/08/05/paypal-outage-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services and Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PayPal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/?p=2439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On August 3, PayPal had a major outage that brought their service offline for an extended period. The systems were down globally for an hour, and it took an additional three-and-a-half hours to bring everything back up to full capacity. What does a 4.5-hour outage mean for PayPal and internet commerce as a whole? Uptime [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 3, PayPal had a major outage that brought their service offline for an extended period. The systems were down globally for an hour, and it took an additional three-and-a-half hours to bring everything back up to full capacity. What does a 4.5-hour outage mean for PayPal and internet commerce as a whole?</p>
<p><a href="http://cnettv.cnet.com/buzz-report-fuzzy-math-building-sized-hookers/9742-1_53-50002384.html"><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright size-full wp-image-2440 imgborder" title="Fuzzy Math" src="//www.webmaster-source.com/wp-content/uploads/fuzzy-math.jpg" alt="Fuzzy Math" width="200" height="119" /></a><a href="http://royal.pingdom.com/2009/08/04/the-paypal-outage-cost-its-users-between-7-and-32-million-usd/">Uptime monitoring service Pingdom suggests</a> that the outage cost businesses between $7 million and $32 million USD, as PayPal claims that they process $2,000 in payments every second.</p>
<p>I opine differently. If I were planning on purchasing a book from Amazon, and their site was inaccessible for a few hours, would I decide to not ever buy the book? No. I&#8217;d mutter something about inconvenient server outages and come back later, when the site is back up. Amazon wouldn&#8217;t lose my $35, they would just receive it the day after. PayPal merchants are no different.<span id="more-2439"></span></p>
<p>Businesses have an increasing tendency to claim that they would have made $x in some case, if not for some circumstance outside their control, when in reality they have no way of knowing. The RIAA is a notorious example of this, where they insist that their declining profits are directly linked to piracy. How can they say that <em>everyone</em> who illegally downloaded an album would have bought it otherwise? They can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>How much money did PayPal&#8217;s downtime cost businesses? There&#8217;s no way of knowing, but I highly doubt it&#8217;s $7 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2009/08/05/paypal-outage-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-06-12 07:29:02 by W3 Total Cache
-->