<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webmaster-Source &#187; pownce</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.webmaster-source.com/tag/pownce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com</link>
	<description>Useful Resources For Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.42</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Twitter vs. Pownce</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/02/13/twitter-vs-pownce/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/02/13/twitter-vs-pownce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pownce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/02/13/twitter-vs-pownce/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been using Twitter for a couple weeks now, and I&#8217;ve been pondering this question lately. &#8220;Why Twitter?&#8221; Pownce has recently come out of private beta, and there hasn&#8217;t been a huge number of people moving from Twitter to Pownce. The newer service&#8217;s premise is closer to the way I use Twitter than to the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using <a href="http://twitter.com/redwall_hp">Twitter</a> for a couple weeks now, and I&#8217;ve been pondering this question lately. &#8220;Why Twitter?&#8221;<a href="http://www.pownce.com/"> Pownce</a> has recently come out of private beta, and there hasn&#8217;t been a huge number of people moving from Twitter to Pownce. The newer service&#8217;s premise is closer to the way I use Twitter than to the way a lot of people do. Pownce is like IM, while Twitter tends to be &#8220;I&#8217;m eating a sandwich,&#8221; saying things for the heck of it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see more people using Pownce, though that causes a problem like we have with IM: People you know use different services, which leaves you using both, trying to manage multiple accounts that essentially do the same thing. Maybe what we need is the equivalent of Jabber, an open standard that can be used to unify the services.<span id="more-414"></span></p>
<p>Anyway, confusion aside, it&#8217;s time to get to the fun part and compare the two services.</p>
<h3>Twitter</h3>
<ul>
<li>Can post via IM or SMS</li>
<li>Let&#8217;s you edit your profile&#8217;s theme, while Pownce demands a &#8220;Pro&#8221; subscription to do more than pick a prefab design</li>
<li>Offers the useful @ reply system.</li>
<li>Has a lot more users</li>
</ul>
<h3>Pownce</h3>
<ul>
<li>Better design overall</li>
<li>Allows more than 140 characters</li>
<li>Is easier to send private messages to other users</li>
<li>Allows you to choose either Message, Link, File, or Event when posting</li>
<li>Let&#8217;s you feature links to your websites, IM accounts, and profiles on Digg, StumbleUpon, YouTube, etc.</li>
</ul>
<p>Both services have some good points. Though I really like the fact that Pownce allows longer messages, has a better private message system, and is more of a communications tool than a sandwich-notification system, I&#8217;m sticking with Twitter, since that&#8217;s what everyone else is using. After all, there&#8217;s no point in using Pownce if you don&#8217;t know anyone who uses it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/02/13/twitter-vs-pownce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Twitter?</title>
		<link>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/01/30/what-is-twitter/</link>
		<comments>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/01/30/what-is-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pownce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/01/30/what-is-twitter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Twitter.com, &#8220;Twitter is a service for friends, family, and co–workers to communicate and stay connected through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing?&#8221; However, it has the potential to be much more than just &#8220;I&#8217;m drinking coffee&#8221; messages. To be honest, most of us don&#8217;t want [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Twitter.com, <em>&#8220;Twitter is a service for friends, family, and co–workers to communicate and stay connected through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing?&#8221;</em> However, it has the potential to be much more than just &#8220;I&#8217;m drinking coffee&#8221; messages. To be honest, most of us don&#8217;t want to know what you&#8217;re doing every minute of the day. The Twitter competitor Pownce describes their site much better: <em>&#8220;Send messages, files, links, and events to your friends. Create a network of friends and share stuff.&#8221;</em> Pownce is marketed as being a communications tool, sort of like public/private IM.</p>
<p>I think of the two services as a sort of IM service that you needn&#8217;t be logged-in to receive messages. They&#8217;re, to me, public IM. Pownce is leading in that aspect (marketing themselves as an IM-like service rather than a system to tell everyone what you&#8217;re doing), but unfortunately, everyone uses Twitter, and therefore sees the notice on the main page that says <em>&#8220;</em><em>What are you doing?&#8221;</em> I&#8217;d like to see less of that usage.</p>
<p>I recently created a Twitter account, and it&#8217;s interesting, though it threatens to be a major time waster (and why must their API have a 70 request per hour limit?). I haven&#8217;t actively used IM in years, and I don&#8217;t have a cellphone, but Twitter so far has pulled me in. I just use it as an IM service/link-sharing system/Tumbleblog (and I have WSC&#8217;s feed auto-posted <img src="https://www.webmaster-source.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> ).</p>
<p>What is Twitter? It&#8217;s IM 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.webmaster-source.com/2008/01/30/what-is-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: www.webmaster-source.com @ 2026-06-08 23:35:24 by W3 Total Cache
-->